2019-2020年高考英語總復(fù)習(xí)真題研練29牛津譯林版.doc

《2019-2020年高考英語總復(fù)習(xí)真題研練29牛津譯林版.doc》由會(huì)員分享，可在線閱讀，更多相關(guān)《2019-2020年高考英語總復(fù)習(xí)真題研練29牛津譯林版.doc（3頁珍藏版）》請?jiān)谘b配圖網(wǎng)上搜索。

2019-2020年高考英語總復(fù)習(xí)真題研練29牛津譯林版Task 1：閱讀下列短文，從每題所給的四個(gè)選項(xiàng)(A、B、C和D)中，選出最佳選項(xiàng)。(xx全國，D)Bad news sells.If it bleeds，it leads.No news is good news，and good news is no news.Those are the classic rules for the evening broadcasts and the morning papers.But now that information is being spread and monitored(監(jiān)控) in different ways，researchers are discovering new rules.By tracking peoples emails and online posts，scientists have found that good news can spread faster and farther than disasters and sob stories.“The if it bleeds rule works for mass media，” says Jonah Berger，a scholar at the University of Pennsylvania.“They want your eyeballs and dont care how youre feeling.But when you share a story with your friends，you care a lot more how they react.You dont want them to think of you as a Debbie Downer.”Researchers analyzing wordofmouth municationemails，Web posts and reviews，facetoface conversationsfound that it tended to be more positive than negative(消極的)，but that didnt necessarily mean people preferred positive news.Was positive news shared more often simply because people experienced more good things than bad things? To test for that possibility，Dr.Berger looked at how people spread a particular set of news stories：thousands of articles on The New York Times website.He and a Penn colleague analyzed the “most emailed” list for six months.One of his first findings was that articles in the science section were much more likely to make the list than nonscience articles.He found that science amazed Times readers and made them want to share this positive feeling with others.Readers also tended to share articles that were exciting or funny，or that inspired negative feelings like anger or anxiety，but not articles that left them merely sad.They needed to be aroused(激發(fā)) one way or the other，and they preferred good news to bad.The more positive an article，the more likely it was to be shared，as Dr.Berger explains in his new book，“Contagious：Why Things Catch On.”【語篇解讀】本文是一篇議論文，研究表明好消息要比壞消息在網(wǎng)絡(luò)上傳播的更快、更廣。1What do the classic rules mentioned in the text apply to?ANews reports.BResearch papers.CPrivate emails.DDaily conversations.答案A細(xì)節(jié)理解題。根據(jù)首段中的Those are the classic rules for the evening broadcasts and the morning papers.可知，這些規(guī)則適用于新聞報(bào)道。故選A。2What can we infer about people like Debbie Downer?ATheyre socially inactive.BTheyre good at telling stories.CTheyre inconsiderate of others.DTheyre careful with their words.答案C細(xì)節(jié)理解題。根據(jù)第二段最后兩句可知，像Debbie Downer那樣的人是不替別人著想的。故選C。3Which tended to be the most emailed according to Dr.Bergers research?ASports news.BScience articles.CPersonal accounts.DFinancial reviews.答案B細(xì)節(jié)理解題。根據(jù)第三段最后兩句可知，人們更愿意發(fā)送一些科學(xué)類的文章。故選B。4What can be a suitable title for the text?ASad Stories Travel Far and WideBOnline News Attracts More PeopleCReading Habits Change with the TimesDGood News Beats Bad on Social Networks答案D文章標(biāo)題題。文章主要表明了通過研究證明了好消息要比壞消息在網(wǎng)絡(luò)上傳播的更快、更廣。故選D。Task 2：詞匯積累1track n軌道；蹤跡 v追蹤；跟蹤2positive adj.積極的；肯定的3negative adj.否定的；消極的；負(fù)面的4review n復(fù)習(xí)；回顧；檢討；評審5monitor v監(jiān)視；監(jiān)督；監(jiān)聽n.班長；監(jiān)視器；計(jì)算機(jī)顯示器6online post網(wǎng)上的帖子7mass media 大眾媒體Task 3：語法填空One of his first finds was _1_ articles in the science section were much more likely to make the list than nonscience articles.He found that science amazed Times readers and made them want to share this positive feeling _2_ others.Readers also tended _3_ (share)articles that were exciting or funny，or that inspired negative feelings like anger or _4_ (anxious)，but not articles that left them merely sad.They needed to be aroused(激發(fā)) one way or the other，and they preferred good news _5_ bad.The more positive an article，the more likely it was to be shared，_6_ Dr.Berger explains in his new book，“Contagious：Why Things Catch On.”答案1.that2.with3.to share4.anxiety5.to6asTask 4：單句改錯(cuò)1They want your eyeballs and dont care what youre feeling.2You dont want them to think you as a Debbie Downer.3Were positive news shared more often simply because people experienced more good things than bad things?答案1.whathow2.think后加as3.WereWasTask 5：攻克長難句(分析句子結(jié)構(gòu)，嘗試翻譯成漢語)Researchers analyzing wordofmouth municationemails，Web posts and reviews，facetoface conversationsfound that it tended to be more positive than negative(消極的)，but that didnt necessarily mean people preferred positive news.分析：本句為連詞but連接的兩個(gè)并列分句，第一個(gè)分句為含有一個(gè)賓語從句的復(fù)合句，主句的主語是Researchers，其后的現(xiàn)在分詞短語analyzing wordofmouth munication作定語，謂語是 found，后面是that引導(dǎo)的賓語從句；第二個(gè)分句也是一個(gè)含有賓語從句的復(fù)合句。譯文：分析口述交際如電子郵件、網(wǎng)帖、評論和面談的研究者發(fā)現(xiàn)，它傾向于更積極而不是消極(的內(nèi)容)，但這并不一定意味著人們更偏愛積極的消息。