皮套圈座多軸鉆孔專機(jī)設(shè)計[三維SW工件圖]

喜歡這套資料就充值下載吧。資源目錄里展示的都可在線預(yù)覽哦。下載后都有，請放心下載，文件全都包含在內(nèi)，圖紙為CAD格式可編輯，有疑問咨詢QQ:414951605 或 1304139763p 編號 無錫太湖學(xué)院 畢業(yè)設(shè)計（論文） 相關(guān)資料 題目： 皮套圈座多軸鉆孔專機(jī)設(shè)計 信機(jī) 系 機(jī)械工程及自動化專業(yè) 學(xué) 號： 　　　 0923176　　　　 學(xué)生姓名： 孫文華 指導(dǎo)教師： 　 尤麗華 （職稱：副教授 ） （職稱： ） 2013年5月25日 目 錄 一、畢業(yè)設(shè)計（論文）開題報告 二、畢業(yè)設(shè)計（論文）外文資料翻譯及原文 三、學(xué)生“畢業(yè)論文（論文）計劃、進(jìn)度、檢查及落實表” 四、實習(xí)鑒定表 無錫太湖學(xué)院 畢業(yè)設(shè)計（論文） 開題報告 題目： 皮套圈座多軸鉆孔專機(jī)設(shè)計 信機(jī) 系 機(jī)械工程及自動化 專業(yè) 學(xué) 號： 0923176 學(xué)生姓名： 孫文華 指導(dǎo)教師： 尤麗華 （職稱：副教授 ） （職稱： ） 2012年11月14日 課題來源 無錫市江泰機(jī)械制造廠是一家專業(yè)從事外協(xié)件加工的企業(yè)，公司現(xiàn)采用加工中心加工紡織機(jī)械零件--皮圈架座上的三個孔,皮套圈座是紡織機(jī)械上一個異形件,加工精度高,用普通機(jī)床加工較困難，工裝時間長，加工成本高，效率不高。因而需要設(shè)計一臺專機(jī)達(dá)到提高工作效率，降低成本。 科學(xué)依據(jù)（包括課題的科學(xué)意義；國內(nèi)外研究概況、水平和發(fā)展趨勢；應(yīng)用前景等） 普通機(jī)床加工零件時，不僅工人勞動強(qiáng)度很大，效率也不高，而且不利于保證產(chǎn)品加工精度。專用機(jī)床是按高度工序集中原則設(shè)計的，即在一臺機(jī)床上可以同時完成許多同一種工序或多種不同工序的加工，它可以同時用多個刀具進(jìn)行切削，機(jī)床的輔助動作實現(xiàn)了自動化，結(jié)構(gòu)比普通機(jī)床簡單，提高了生產(chǎn)效率。 專用機(jī)床與普通機(jī)床比較，具有以下特點： ⑴專用機(jī)床上的通用部件和標(biāo)準(zhǔn)零件約占全部機(jī)床零、部件總量的70%到80%，因此設(shè)計和制造的周期短、投資少、經(jīng)濟(jì)效益好。 ⑵由于專用機(jī)床采用多刀加工，并且自動化程度高，因而比普通機(jī)床生產(chǎn)率高，產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量穩(wěn)定，勞動強(qiáng)度底。 ⑶專用機(jī)床的通用部件是經(jīng)過周密的設(shè)計和長期生產(chǎn)實踐考驗的，又有專門廠家成批制造，因此結(jié)構(gòu)穩(wěn)定，工作可靠，使用和維修方便。 ⑷專用機(jī)床易于聯(lián)成專用機(jī)床自動線，以適應(yīng)大規(guī)模的生產(chǎn)需要。 隨著社會經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展，機(jī)械制造業(yè)也愈來愈受到人們的關(guān)注。在皮套圈座方面，生產(chǎn)效率不僅嚴(yán)重地威脅著企業(yè)的經(jīng)濟(jì)情況，而且大量的工作危害著生產(chǎn)者的健康,立式多軸鉆孔專機(jī)有效的緩解了這一現(xiàn)象。鉆孔的要求越高,工人的工作量也就越大,針對手工鉆孔的技術(shù)要求也就越高,工人保持長期的精力積中,容易出現(xiàn)生產(chǎn)安全事故,危害性較大.針對這一情況,各個企業(yè)采用了不同的方案,包括使用單一的鉆床來減輕勞動者的疲勞度 ,這些措施在一定改善員工的作業(yè)要求,但還不能滿足要求。因此,研究合適的皮套圈座立式多軸鉆孔專機(jī),降低了工作強(qiáng)度,特別是減緩工人的精力過度集中,對于防止企業(yè)的生產(chǎn)事故有明顯的效果和保護(hù)作業(yè)人員的生命安全有十分重要的意義。 多軸鉆孔最早出現(xiàn)在日本地區(qū)，后經(jīng)臺灣傳入大陸。距今已有二十年的歷史。 隨著國家不斷的加大對外開放,經(jīng)濟(jì)受到了劇烈的競爭,生產(chǎn)效率成為各個公司緩解壓力的關(guān)鍵點,皮套圈座多軸鉆孔專機(jī)面臨著更廣闊的應(yīng)用空間。 研究內(nèi)容 皮套圈座多軸鉆孔專機(jī)的工作原理,結(jié)構(gòu)組成,以及工作特點,控制系統(tǒng);了解該系統(tǒng)機(jī)構(gòu)的制造工藝,控制系統(tǒng),安全裝置的工作原理。 在前幾年,手動鉆孔機(jī)應(yīng)用在我國較為廣泛,隨著競爭的不斷加劇,機(jī)械加工精度要求不斷地提高,手工鉆孔逐漸被淘汰.單軸鉆孔專機(jī)的出現(xiàn)越來越頻繁,世界的一體化不斷加劇,多軸鉆孔專機(jī)取代了單軸鉆孔專機(jī)受到越來越廣的應(yīng)用.隨著多軸鉆孔的興起,多軸鉆孔專機(jī)大體上分為兩大類,可調(diào)式和固定式 多軸鉆床按其加工件的硬度來劃分，可分為中切削型、重切削型和強(qiáng)力超重切削型三類。中切削適用于鋁、鎂、銅等HB≤150以下的工件。重切削適用于孔數(shù)大于10個的軟質(zhì)件或7孔以下的鋼、鐵等HB≤265以下的工件。強(qiáng)力超重切削型試用于265≤HB≤330鋼、鐵等強(qiáng)硬度工件。 總之，綜合考慮各種情況，得出一個最優(yōu)設(shè)計方案，設(shè)計一個符合實際情況的皮套圈座立式多軸鉆孔專機(jī)。 擬采取的研究方法、技術(shù)路線、實驗方案及可行性分析 通過對多軸鉆孔專機(jī)的實物研究和要加工產(chǎn)品的市場研究和產(chǎn)品分析,總結(jié)得出皮套圈座多軸鉆孔專機(jī)的基本結(jié)構(gòu),工作方式與原理.然后根據(jù)考察的結(jié)果,再查閱相關(guān)書籍,確定基本的設(shè)計參數(shù),進(jìn)行初步的三維建模。交由指導(dǎo)老師檢查,修改.完成后,再對主要載荷部件進(jìn)行校核.最后出主要零件的零件圖,編寫設(shè)計說明書。 可行性分析：《我國多軸鉆床行業(yè)2010年發(fā)展報告》指出2010年多軸鉆床行業(yè)總產(chǎn)值上年增長20%，出口合同額比上年增長15%。目前，國內(nèi)已有眾多廠家在進(jìn)行皮套圈座多軸鉆孔專機(jī)等相關(guān)產(chǎn)品的生產(chǎn)研發(fā)工作，如無錫市，數(shù)家公司完成對此的研發(fā)，并成功用于產(chǎn)品的加工.由此可見，該設(shè)計方案切實可行。 研究計劃及預(yù)期成果 研究計劃: 2002年10月12日-2002年12月25日：按照任務(wù)書要求查閱論文相關(guān)參考資料。 2013年3月8日-2013年3月14日：按照要求修改畢業(yè)設(shè)計開題報告。 2013年3月15日-2013年3月21日：學(xué)習(xí)并翻譯一篇與畢業(yè)設(shè)計相關(guān)的英文材料。 2013年4月12日-2013年4月25日：機(jī)床設(shè)計。 2013年4月26日-2013年5月21日：畢業(yè)論文撰寫和修改工作。 預(yù)期成果： 此多軸鉆孔專機(jī)的研究成功可以有效的降低工作強(qiáng)度,主要體現(xiàn)在下面幾個方面: (1)科學(xué)鉆孔,降低對員工的技術(shù)要求。 (2)提高效率,增加經(jīng)濟(jì)效益.。 今年來我國生產(chǎn)事故不斷，造成重大人民生命財產(chǎn)的損失，其中很多就是由于長時間的精力高度集中引起的。 特色或創(chuàng)新之處 近年來我國皮套圈座多軸鉆孔專機(jī)有了較大的發(fā)展。動力系統(tǒng),傳動系統(tǒng),鉆孔的質(zhì)量和技術(shù)水平都有較大的提高。特別在孔的精度上，達(dá)到了更高的水平。在其它方面均有較大的突破。 我設(shè)計的皮套圈座多軸鉆孔專機(jī)的特色也在于此，即注重實用性和經(jīng)濟(jì)性；效率高；同時性價比高，成本低。 已具備的條件和尚需解決的問題 已具備的條件：設(shè)計過程中所需要的各種軟硬件資源和相關(guān)產(chǎn)品實物照片。 尚需解決的問題：相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)資料的缺乏，對一些結(jié)構(gòu)設(shè)計部分的具體設(shè)計指導(dǎo)，以及三維軟件的高級運(yùn)用技巧。 指導(dǎo)教師意見 指導(dǎo)教師簽名： 年 月 日 教研室（學(xué)科組、研究所）意見 教研室主任簽名： 年 月 日 系意見 主管領(lǐng)導(dǎo)簽名： 年 月 日 英文原文 Small-hole drilling in engineering plastics sheet and its accuracy estimation Hiroki Endo and Etsuo Marui Abstract In recent manufacturing processes, the small diameter hole drilling process is frequently used owing to its good characteristics. The drilling process can easily be adapted to wide variations in lot size, processing accuracy, processing spot patterns where holes are made, and so on. Many machine elements, which have small diameter holes, are manufactured using engineering plastics of superior material and machining properties. However, it is not easy to drill holes with a diameter smaller than 1?mm, in recent machining technology as well. In this report, 1-mm diameter holes are drilled on two engineering plastics sheets and their drilling accuracy is discussed. Keywords: Small diameter hole; Drilling; Engineering plastics; Machining accuracy 1. Introduction Processing of small diameter holes is done in various materials, corresponding to the trend of downsizing or high accuracy in parts incorporated into electronic equipments, medical instruments or textile machineries. Many techniques are put to practical use, including drilling, ultrasonic machining, electric discharge machining, electrolytic machining, laser beam machining, electron beam machining, fluid or abrasive jet machining, and chemical blanking. Depending on the workpiece material, the machining accuracy, and the lot size, the best process for making holes of small diameter may be appropriately selected. Within these various machining processes, the drilling process can readily deal with a wide variety of machining conditions. However, there are some difficult problems in drilling holes smaller than 1?mm in diameter. For example, a large load cannot be put on small drills, owing to their low strength and rigidity. Thus, the feed rate per unit drill rotation must be set small. The removal of drilled chips is difficult owing to the small drill flute area. In many cases, engineering plastics are used in making various machine parts because they are light and have superior specific strength (that is, the ratio of tensile strength to density) compared with carbon steel. Also, the material cost of engineering plastics is competitive and their machinability is fairly good. With these points as background, the orthogonal cutting of engineering plastics was investigated [1] and it was suggested here that the visco–elastic properties of engineering plastics have some effects on the magnitude of cutting force and the surface roughness of machined surfaces. There is a review paper [2] regarding the machining of engineering plastics. In this review paper, drilling process was also treated. It was pointed out that the heating up of the workpiece due to build-up of swarf on drill flutes is an obstacle to the drilling process of engineering plastics. Recently, some experiments have been attempted on drilling glass–fiber-reinforced engineering plastics sheets [3] and [4], and the thrust force and torque during drilling have been measured. In these papers, it was reported that the delamination phenomenon decreases the drilled hole integrity, when holes of about 5-mm diameter are drilled. However, the investigation on the accuracy in small hole drilling of engineering plastics is left pending. Then in this paper, small diameter holes of 1?mm are drilled in two typical engineering plastics sheets, and the effect of spindle speed and feed rate on the accuracy (radius error) is estimated. 2. Workpiece materials Two typical engineering plastics sheets, polyacetal (POM) and polyetherimide (PEI), were drilled. The materials properties are listed in Table 1. Table 1. Material properties of workpiece engineering plastics Performance Unit POM PEI Specific gravity 1.41 1.27 Rate of water % 0.22 0.25 Melting point °C 165 210 Coefficient of linear thermal expansion cm/cm/°C 9×10?5 5.6×10?5 Tensile strength MPa 61 124 Tensile extension (Yielding point) % 40 23 Bending strength MPa 89 157 Bending elasticity GPa 2.60 3.07 Compressive strength MPa 103 118 Izote impact value J/m 74 42 Rockwell hardness M scale 119 127 Polyacetal is a crystallized engineering plastics material. The main raw materials are acetal co-polymer and homo-polymer. POM has good fatigue properties and machinability. Many cams, guides and liners are made of POM. Very high accuracy is needed in these machined parts. PEI is an amorphous engineering plastic having superior thermal resistance characteristics. Special electrical parts, for example, electric insulators, connectors, are made of PEI, which is superior in mechanical strength but inferior in machinability to POM. The workpiece size was: length 100?mm, width 50?mm and thickness 0.8?mm. 3. Experimental apparatus and procedure The drilling machine used is for small diameter holes, and is equipped with an automatic feed mechanism. A high-frequency induction motor positioned at the uppermost position of the main spindle drives the spindle. Maximum spindle speed is 12,500?rpm. The net spindle speed of the spindle during the drilling is measured by a tachometer, which counts number of the laser beam reflected from a reflective tape pasted on the scroll chuck. A servomotor for drill feed drives the feed motion of the spindle. The feed is stepless, and a dial gauge equipped at the spindle head measures the length of the drill motion in the spindle axis direction. A stopwatch was used to measure the time needed for this length. The ratio of the moved length to the time is the substantial feed rate per unit time. The spindle speed was varied between 1250 and 12,500?rpm. And also the feed rate per unit time was varied between 0.405 and 1.986?mm/s. Spindle speed was varied in keeping with the feed rate per unit time. Hence, the feed rate per unit drill rotation became small with the increase in the spindle speed of the drill. The drill spindle end is attached to the scroll chuck. The drill used here is a conventional twist drill made of high-speed steel with a diameter of 1?mm. In some extra experiments, a 0.3?mm-diameter drill was also used. Such drills have no surface treatment. A dial gauge estimates deflection accuracy of the drill on the scroll chuck during rotation. Extreme care was taken so that the drill deflection was smaller than 5?μm. The same drill made five holes under the cutting condition of the same spindle speed and the same feed rate. Another drill was used in the drilling under another cutting condition. Of course, the size accuracy of these drills exists within the above-mentioned size scattering. Any evidence of the wear of drills and the build-up of swarf on drill flutes were not recognized after five holes drilling. Formerly mentioned workpiece of engineering plastics were set on the base of the drilling machine by clamping bolts. Dry cutting without fluid was performed. 4. Calculation of drilled hole shapes The 1-mm diameter holes drilled on engineering plastics sheets by the process described above are not geometrically true circles, but have a small radial deviation. Shape accuracy of the drilled holes is estimated by the following process. An optical microscope equipped with digital measuring device measures the shape of the drilled hole. The cross wire of the microscope is set at the circumference of the hole. Then, the coordinates (x,y) of the hole circumference are read. Dividing the circumference into 18 equal parts, the same measurements are then repeated on each spot on the circumference. Using these 18 sets of measured qualities, the equation of the circle that fits closely to the drilled hole is calculated. This is called a least square circle, and in the calculation, the least squares method is applied. The equation of the least square circle is assumed as follows: x2+y2+Ax+By+C=0 (1) Owing to the shape error of the hole, the right hand side of Eq. (1) does not become zero when the above-mentioned measured qualities (xi,yi) are substituted. The residual in this case is vi and the following equation is obtained: (2) Here, the coefficients A, B, C in Eq. (1) are determined as the sum of the squared values of the residual vi becomes minimum. Values of these coefficients are obtained by solving the following simultaneous linear equations. In the calculation, N=18. (3) Moreover, the coordinates (x0,y0) of the center of the least square circle and its radius rm are obtained as follows: Corresponding to the above process, the least square circles are described. An example is shown in Fig. 1, where the workpiece material is PEI, drill diameter: 1?mm, spindle speed: 12,500?rpm, and feed rate: 0.405?mm/s. The least square circle is indicated by the broken line. 5. Estimation of machining accuracy and experimental results Machining accuracy of the drilled holes is estimated by the radius error obtainable from the least square circles. The calculation process of the radius error is given here. Radius ri at the each measuring spot (xi,yi) is obtained from the coordinate of the least square circle center (x0,y0) of Eqs. (4) and (5) as follows: (7) Then, the radius error is calculated by the following equation. The parameter rm in the equation is the radius of the least square circle given by Eq. (6). Δri=ri?rm (8) And the position of that measuring spot on the circle is represented by the following angle θi. (9) The relation between Δri and θi obtained from the above method is shown in Fig. 2 as a radius error curve. The drilling conditions in this figure are the same as those of Fig. 1 Three concavities and convexities are recognized on the circumference. Then, the drilled hole shape is approximately triangular. Similar results were obtained in other workpiece materials for other drilling conditions. Furthermore, it is seen that the circumference of the drilled hole exists in the vicinity within ±0.02?mm from the least square circle. This drilled hole shape is similar to that produced by the so-called drill walking phenomenon [5]. The radius of the least square circle is slightly larger than that of the drill. The difference between them is about 10?μm. Result of Fig. 2 is obtained in the measurement at the drill entrance into workpiece. Small burr was formed at the drill exist and the accuracy measurement could not carry out as it is. Then, the burr was forcibly removed and the accuracy was measured. Almost the same accuracy was confirmed, because the workpiece is thin (0.8?mm thickness). These radius errors are rearranged as functions of the spindle speed or the feed rate for every workpiece material. The results are given in Fig. 3, Fig. 4, Fig. 5 and Fig. 6. Error bars indicate the distribution range of the experimental data. The radius error becomes small hyperbolically with the increase in the feed rate and becomes large linearly with the spindle speed. Small diameter drills were used in this experiment and their bending rigidity is low. Rotational cutting speed is almost zero near the chisel point. At that point, the drill has only a small axial velocity corresponding to the drill feed motion. Accordingly, the rate of penetration [6] is extremely small when the feed rate is small. As mentioned above, the walking phenomenon occurs owing to small errors in drill size. This phenomenon is compounded with the effect of small rate of penetration when small feed rate and large spindle speed are applied. Hence, the positioning accuracy of the drill point against the workpiece is not very good at small feed rate and large spindle speed. As a result, it is supposed that the radius error becomes large. For example, the rate of penetration, that is the feed rate per unit drill rotation, is about 2?μm when the drill rotation speed is 12,500?rpm and the feed rate is 0.405?mm/s. The rate of penetration is about 100?μm when the drill spindle speed is smallest (1250?rpm) and the feed rate is largest (1.986?mm/s). One reason for the radius error worsening when the rotation speed becomes high is that chatter [6] related to the drill dynamic characteristics is possible. However, the small drill size errors and the relative drop in the feed rate per unit drill rotation corresponding to the spindle speed increase have a large effect on the radius error. In conclusion, it is important to drill a small hole in the drilling condition so as to maintain a sufficiently high feed rate per unit drill rotation. An example of superposition of the results of POM and PEI is given in Fig. 7. It is recognized in this figure that the radius accuracy in the drilling of PEI is slightly inferior to that of POM. PEI is a kind of supper engineering plastics. PEI is superior to POM in tensile strength, compressive strength, bending strength, bending elasticity and Rockwell hardness, as seen in Table 1. Owing to this, the machinability of PEI may be worse than that of POM and the result of Fig. 7 regarding the radius error was be obtained. 6. Concluding remarks Small holes were drilled in two engineering plastics sheets POM and PEI using a drill 1?mm in diameter. Drilling can be done on both workpiece materials. Reading the drilled hole shape by optical micrometer, and calculating the least square circle, the drilling accuracy (radius error) can be estimated. The radius error becomes worse when the drill feed rate is small and the spindle speed is large. The feed rate per unit drill rotation is relatively small when the spindle speed is large. Hence, it is supposed that the positioning accuracy of the drill against the workpiece is not good, and that the radius error becomes worse under the drilling conditions in which the feed rate per unit drill rotation is small. From this fact, it is desirable that small diameter holes be drilled in the condition in which the feed rate does not become low. References [1] K.Q. Xiao and L.C. Zhang, The role of viscous deformation in the machining of polymers, International Journal of Mechanical Science 44 (2002), pp. 2317–2336. [2] M. Alauddin, I.A. El Baradie and M.S.J. Hashmi, Plastics and their machining: a review, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 54 (1995), pp. 40–60. [3] W.-C. Chen, Some experimental investigations in the drilling of carbon fiber-reinforced plastic (CFRP) composite laminates, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 37 (1997), pp. 1097–110. [4] E. Capello, Workpiece damping and its effect on delamination damage in drilling thin composite laminates, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 148 (2004), pp. 186–195. [5] M. Tsueda, Y. Hasegawa and H. Kimura, On walking phenomenon of drill, Transactions of the JSME 27 (1961), pp. 816–823. [6] D.F. Galloway, Some experiments on the influence of various factors on drill performance, Transactions of the ASME 79 (1957), pp. 191–231. 中文譯文 小孔鉆在工程塑料片材方面及其精度估算 摘要 在最近的制造流程中，小直徑鉆孔由于其良好的特性經(jīng)常被使用。鉆孔工藝能夠輕易的適用于大部分尺寸，加工精度，加工點孔，等等。許多有小直徑孔的機(jī)械零件，是使用優(yōu)質(zhì)金屬材料和機(jī)器特性制造出來的。然而，在最近的加工技術(shù)中，鉆一個直徑小于1 毫米的孔也是不容易的。在這份報告中，直徑為1毫米的孔在兩個工程塑料板材的鉆孔和鉆孔的精度進(jìn)行了討論。 關(guān)鍵詞：小直徑孔；鉆孔；工程塑料；加工精度 1.簡介 在各種材料中都存在小直徑孔的加工，根據(jù)數(shù)據(jù)趨勢或從電子設(shè)備中反映零件部分的高精度，醫(yī)療器械、紡織機(jī)械。許多技術(shù)投入實際使用，包括鉆孔，超聲加工，電火花加工，電解加工，激光束加工，電子束加工，液體或磨料噴射加工，化學(xué)消隱。根據(jù)工件材料，加工精度，和尺寸的大小，可以選擇小直徑鉆孔的最佳工藝。在這些不同的加工工藝中，鉆孔工藝可以很容易地處理大部分的加工情況。 但是，鉆孔直徑小于1毫米時有一些困難的問題。例如，一個大的負(fù)載不能放在小鉆頭上，由于其較低的強(qiáng)度和剛度。因此，每單位鉆孔旋轉(zhuǎn)進(jìn)給速度必須設(shè)置小。由于其小的鉆孔區(qū)域，鉆屑的去除是一個困難的問題。 在許多情況下，與碳鋼相比工程塑料被使用用于制造各種機(jī)械零件（即，拉伸強(qiáng)度與密度的比值）是因為他們輕和具有較高的強(qiáng)度。同時，工程塑料材料成本擁有競爭性，其加工性能較好。 以這些問題為背景，研究了工程塑料的正交切削[ 1 ]和建議在工程塑料的彈性性質(zhì)–切削力的大小和加工表面的表面粗糙度的影響。有一份關(guān)于工程塑料加工的審查報告[2]。在這篇綜述報告中，鉆孔過程也被關(guān)注。指出出對于工程塑料鉆孔由于鉆孔過程中的切屑的累計而導(dǎo)致的材料過熱。最近，一些實驗已經(jīng)嘗試在鉆孔中使用玻璃纖維來增強(qiáng)塑料片材[ 3 ]，鉆孔過程中的軸向力和扭矩進(jìn)行了測量。在這些論文中，當(dāng)孔直徑約5毫米，分層現(xiàn)象會減少鉆孔的完整性。但是，在工程塑料小鉆孔精度調(diào)查尚未解決。 在這個報告中，1?毫米的小直徑孔在兩個典型的工程塑料板材的鉆孔，主軸轉(zhuǎn)速和進(jìn)給速度對精度的影響（半徑誤差）估計。 2.工程材料 在兩個典型的工程塑料聚甲醛（POM）和聚醚酰亞胺（PEI）。材料特性列于表1。 表1 工程塑料加工件的材料特性 性能 單位 POM PEI 比重 1.41 1.27 水率 % 0.22 0.25 熔點 °C 165 210 線性熱膨脹 cm/cm/°C 9×10?5 5.6×10?5 拉伸強(qiáng)度 MPa 61 124 拉伸（屈服點） % 40 23 彎曲強(qiáng)度 MPa 89 157 彎曲彈性模量 GPa 2.60 3.07 抗壓強(qiáng)度 MPa 103 118 絲蘭沖擊值 J/m 74 42 羅克韋爾硬度 M scale 119 127 聚甲醛是一種明確的工程塑料材料。主要原料是縮醛共聚物和均聚物。聚甲醛具有良好的疲勞性能和加工性能。許多凸輪，導(dǎo)板和線路是聚甲醛制成的。非常高的精度是在這些加工零件所需要的。PEI是具有優(yōu)良的熱特性的無定形工程塑料。特殊的電氣部件，例如，絕緣子，連接器，是由PEI制成的，它在較好的機(jī)械強(qiáng)度而機(jī)械加工性能不如POM優(yōu)越。 工件尺寸為：長100?毫米，寬50毫米，厚0.8毫米??。 3.試驗設(shè)